<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Prestidigitation of Bradd - Latest Comments in 10g Migration Ramification Part 1: ORA-1426, Numeric Overflow</title><link>http://piontekdd.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://piontekdd.disqus.com/10g_migration_ramification_part_1_ora_1426_numeric_overflow/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:03:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 10g Migration Ramification Part 1: ORA-1426, Numeric Overflow</title><link>https://piontekdd.github.io/10g-migration-ramification-part-1-ora/#comment-2845500151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the best form of tutorial for those people who needs to gain some new output in programming and would also help them in aiming for what is the best for their work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">best essay services reviews</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:03:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10g Migration Ramification Part 1: ORA-1426, Numeric Overflow</title><link>https://piontekdd.github.io/10g-migration-ramification-part-1-ora/#comment-355614736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ERROR at line 1:&lt;br&gt;ORA-01426: numeric overflow&lt;br&gt;ORA-06512: at "REHBER.SWITCH_TABLE_PRC", line 56&lt;br&gt;ORA-06512: at line 1&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hakan Caliskan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 08:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10g Migration Ramification Part 1: ORA-1426, Numeric Overflow</title><link>https://piontekdd.github.io/10g-migration-ramification-part-1-ora/#comment-2019958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kumar. Thanks for the comment. I had planned on additional entires around the 10g migration but got super busy at work and took a holiday as well. I'm starting to think that with 10g Desupport looming in July of 2010 (less than two years) it may make more sense to start to look at 11g and skip 10g altogether. With some system's 10g upgrade testing time lines stretching 3-4 months (depending on complexity) upgrading to 10g at this point doesn't have a lot of upside. Oracle may change their 10gR2 date, not sure at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">piontekdd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:22:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10g Migration Ramification Part 1: ORA-1426, Numeric Overflow</title><link>https://piontekdd.github.io/10g-migration-ramification-part-1-ora/#comment-1997057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is definitely a wonderful peace of information.  Do you have any more suggestions/tips.  Please through some light on us.  Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kumar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>